Untitled Document

Court dismisses claim over FERC decision on hydro facility

FERC Logo

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on HydroWorld.com sister site GenerationHub.com. For more Federal Energy Regulatory Commission news and updates, visit the HydroWorld.com Premium Content section.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims on March 11 dismissed a damages action brought by the Skokomish Indian Tribe, as well as the individual members of the Tribe, deriving from the construction and operation of the Cushman Hydroelectric Project, upstream from the Tribe’s reservation in Washington state.

The plaintiffs alleged that the federal government failed to protect their interests with respect to the licensing and operation of the hydroelectric project, thereby violating its obligations arising under a treaty as well as various statutes. They also said that defendant’s actions effectuated a temporary takings under the Fifth Amendment. The court on March 11 granted a federal government motion to dismiss.

Parts of this matter date back decades, to when the dam was first built. More recently, in August 2006, in City of Tacoma v. FERC, the D.C. Circuit held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was required to include the Section 4(e) conditions issued by the Secretary of the Interior in Tacoma’s new license. Notwithstanding, Tacoma was allowed to continue to operate the Cushman Project under the terms and conditions of its 1924 license, without conditions for the protection of the Skokomish Reservation, until July 2010, when FERC issued a final amended license order.

In October 2011, following the dismissal of plaintiffs’ appeal in the Ninth Circuit, the clerk docketed this case. In April 2012, defendant filed its motion to dismiss. Thereafter, the parties participated in several alternative dispute resolution sessions. When a settlement did not materialize, a schedule for briefing the defendant’s motion to dismiss was issued. Briefing and argument on that motion were then completed, resulting in the March 11 dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

Related Articles

Kim Ogren: Graduating Researcher of the Hydro Research Foundation

Kim Ogren is a PhD candidate in Geography at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Ore., and...

U.S. Department of Commerce official Chandra Brown joins HydroVision keynote lineup

Organizers of the world's largest hydroelectric power event are pleased to announce the addi...

Cemig has operating right for 242-MW Jaguara hydropower plant revoked

The Brazilian Supreme Court ruled this week that utility company Cemig has no right to renew...

Hydroelectric power included in U.S. bill pushing mandatory energy storage

Legislation introduced to the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources earlier ...

Recent Comments




Hydro Slideshows

more slideshows >>  

Hydro Whitepapers

Industry News

Editor's Picks

06/01/2015
Volume 34, Issue 5
05/01/2015
Volume 23, Issue 3

Buyers Guide Products

Buyers Guide Companies